An Aesthetic of Poverty?

It's a little too late for me to be writing a full-blown essay on this tonight. But I was just flipping through a photo essay from the Washington Post titled: Recession in the Rust Belt and became disturbed by what seems to be a poverty aesthetic.

Update: This morning Emily West, a prof at U Mass, posted this Slate article on Levi's new "Go Forth" ad campaign and it's use of iconic Walt Whitman verse, and dramatic imagery such as; "children playing in run-down neighborhoods, an embattled business executive surrounded by an angry mob, and young people frolicking in blue jeans", to produce a feeling of "squalor and anxiety" paired with what you might call a pioneer spirit.

After setting the ominous tone, the spot goes on to portray youth in distressed jeans, carrying heroic signage. Slate's Seth Stevenson proposes that the ad "acts as a galvanizing call to generational action: Times may be tough, but we've been here before, and America's youth will not be broken." Yes, and the first action will be Googling Walt Whitman, the second, paying full price for a pair of 501s.

I am reminded of the kind of stuff Susan Sontag was writing just after September 11th. She described the war on terror as a metaphorical war, one that had no end and was used to justify xenophobia and insecurity. The images generated by 2001 and the subsequent war on terror, justified people's feelings of suspicion, and led to further images, which further justified suspicion and paranoia. An aesthetic of fear, and thus of war.

Or (and I am extemporizing here a bit so be generous) Vietnam, and how the imagery from that war shocked people into action but at the same time inspired a generation of vigilante movies set in tropical jungles and featuring scary pan-global communist devils.

In the photo essay that inspired this post, images of tumble-down factories that were either abandoned 40 years ago, or firebombed out of all recognition a week after filing for chapter 11 in November of 2009 (slide 4), lead the viewer to attach a nostalgia to the present crisis that should not be here.

This is not the depression of the phonograph factory going bust (see slide 2) or the soda shoppe at the corner shutting it's doors (see slide 11). This is a new crisis, and it's happening in the present. By aping the style of artists like Dorothea Lange the photo essay, and the Levi's ad both frame this recession as a problem that has already happened.

Frankly, I am not so interested in rose-colored glasses right now.

Comments

Thanks for the post. This ad does demonstrate, as Stevenson points to, the tension between art & commerce advertisers deal in. What is so depressing is the potential for the images we see to become a new American dream—one of accepting poverty as a hip condition instead of something to struggle (politically! collectively!) against. Seen this month’s cover of Glamour w/ Sarah Jessica in the designer torn jeans of the moment?

Hi Michelle,

I haven't actually seen that cover but I will go look.

Maybe there is aspect too, of trying to disguise wealth? When everyone around you is going broke, it's not a good idea to look really ritzy yourself. Designer poverty gives the appearance of a more level playing field right?

Comfortably, the article is actually the freshest on this noteworthy topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be enough, for the tremendous clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates. Gratifying work and much success in your business endeavors!

casino en ligne

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.